> I feel almost sorry to not write a lengthy counter rebuttal, but sadly I agree with everything you said! Would I prefer Zig to have a strong type system? Abso

> I feel almost sorry to not write a lengthy counter rebuttal, but sadly I agree with everything you said! Would I prefer Zig to have a strong type system? Absolutely! But the reason why I choose Zig as a comparator is not because I feel that it does a significantly better Job at correctness than Rust, neither do. In other words your argument was incoherent and you have no rebuttal. What a nice way to tap out. Saying that Rust isn’t verified enough is fine. But the post became incoherent when you brought up another language.