3 ms·
That all might be true, but there are ways to improve on those points. For instance thorium reactors are much more efficient in terms of waste, and they are mu
by skohan 5y ago
That all might be true, but there are ways to improve on those points. For instance thorium reactors are much more efficient in terms of waste, and they are much safer.
A lot of problems we have with Nuclear is because the tech most widely used was created with a side goal of advancing nuclear weapon production.
I'm by no means a nuclear maximalist, but I could see better nuclear being a component of a larger sustainable energy strategy.
- gefhfff 5y agoThorium reactors are a castle in the air
- skohan 5y agoEverything is until it isn't right? Do you think there's a fundamental problem there, or is it just taking too long?
- kitkat_new 5y agotaking too long is a fundamental problem here
- skohan 5y agoSome problems are complex. If you asked me in 2012 if fuel cell cars would ever exist I would have called it a pipe-dream, but now you can buy one and use it as a real vehicle in California.
- kitkat_new 5y agoand when did we think we would have got fusion? We can't rely on pipe dreams when solving the climate crisis
- skohan 5y agoI'm not saying thorium is a solution to the climate crisis. But I think the balance is a bit far in the other direction: people rule out Nuclear unnecessarily as a part of a larger clean energy strategy because of bad associations with mushroom clouds and Chernobyl/Three Mile Island.
- kitkat_new 5y agoand waste