4 ms·
Have you followed any of the links in the article and read about all the documents unsealed in the case against Google? Or have you even read the article?
by dmitriid 5y ago
Have you followed any of the links in the article and read about all the documents unsealed in the case against Google?
Or have you even read the article?
- lern_too_spel 5y agoYes, yes, and yes. Have you? The claims quoted in this article were provided without any documents from Google, let alone a mechanism for how the non-AMP ad delay worked. I described the mechanism. What part of the description did you not understand, so I can clarify it for you? The author made the elementary mistake of blindly trusting the prosecutor without putting on his engineer hat to figure out if the prosecutor's allegations made any sense whatsoever.
- CRConrad 5y ago>> Have you ... and ...? >> Or have you even read the article? > Yes, yes, and yes. Not so much on that last "yes": > The author ... without putting on his engineer hat >>> Sarah Gooding Putting on her engineer hat.
- lern_too_spel 5y agoI realized that after I had commented but could not correct it due to the edit button going away. HN guidelines require you to "respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."