4 ms·
There is a lot to discuss here, but if I had to choose I would reject your idea. This is mostly because, in reality, manufacturers not only will they never ope
by alexvoda 5y ago
There is a lot to discuss here, but if I had to choose I would reject your idea.
This is mostly because, in reality, manufacturers not only will they never open source those apps, most probably they will never provide APIs and the Thing and associated apps will depend on some server. Such a dependency I find unacceptable, but it is the trend of all things IoT.
If this were not the case, if by law all IoT Things had to provide open APIs, I would be all for it.
- jacknews 5y agoI agree, please no server, no cloud, no auto-update, the interface should be local. 'Right to repair' laws should extend to 'right to program' , thus forcing open APIs of some kind. There should be some kind of standard, defacto, or official.