2 ms·

Well, I think it was also meant to be highly distributed as well (many different people all over the place could then come back and bring their changes together

by nijave 5y ago

Well, I think it was also meant to be highly distributed as well (many different people all over the place could then come back and bring their changes together) In order to achieve that, I think you end up with some additional complexity like local vs remote and a complicated graph structure to accommodate people coming "on" and "off" line

unclebucknasty 5y ago
>Well, I think it was also meant to be highly distributed as well Yeah, I guess I kind of consider that an agile tenet: in general, that people can work quickly and iteratively with limited interdependencies. Said another way, it would be difficult for teams to work in an agile fashion--where the work itself is frequently distributed and happening in parallel--using most older VCS models.