4 ms·
1) It's unmaintainable. 2) It's ugly. If you ever need a semantic naming convention for closely related variables that are crucial to use correctly (encrypted
by msg 15y ago
1) It's unmaintainable.
2) It's ugly.
If you ever need a semantic naming convention for closely related variables that are crucial to use correctly (encryptedCustomerInformation vs decryptedCustomerInformation), make up your own ad hoc.
- georgieporgie 15y agoIt's unmaintainable. Why is that? The only time I've ever seen 'Hungarian' notation cause maintenance problems is when a dev changed the type of a variable without adjusting the name accordingly. That's a problem with the developer, not the convention. It's ugly. That's purely subjective.
- JoeAltmaier 15y agoSO, ad-hoc techniques are more readable? I lost you. It may be trouble to determine what the prefixes mean. To have no pattern at all, IMO is not at all an improvement.