3 ms·
I hope you are playing devil's advocate and don't mean this seriously. 1. When you enter it into a computer, everything changes. The scale with which data can
by gpvos 5y ago
I hope you are playing devil's advocate and don't mean this seriously.
1. When you enter it into a computer, everything changes. The scale with which data can be stored, distributed and aggregated is just staggeringly more huge.
2. People don't like ads, except for a few weirdos. Ads are not a service in the interest of the consumer.
3. Knowing someone personally is fine, but passing on that knowledge without their consent, or at least knowing for certain that it is in their interest, is a no-no.
And that's only the three most egregious things you get wrong.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- thegrimmest 5y agoA computer is just an augmentation of a mind. It does the same things, just more perfectly. Shouldn't we all be able to augment our minds as we see fit? Should our freedoms change in the process? People who attract new customers with ads must like them. People who were informed of a product that meets their previously-unserved needs must also, right? 3. is just plain old gossip, which is also what I'm describing. It has always been in poor taste, and should never be illegal or regulated at all. Only religions do that.
- Kim_Bruning 5y agoSome forms of "gossip" (such as slander) are actually harmful, and thus probably should have legal consequences (and usually does).