3 ms·
"f cannot be a factor of n+1 or n-1" You are mostly just restating Euclid's proof that there are an infinite number of primes.
by lkrubner 5y ago
"f cannot be a factor of n+1 or n-1"
You are mostly just restating Euclid's proof that there are an infinite number of primes.
- thaumasiotes 5y agoThis is an observation on which the proof depends, but, as is logically required, it is not the proof.