3 ms·
So naturally, my knee-jerk reaction is to create some kind of checklist language and interpreter. Which is almost wrong, of course. I say "almost", because it
by hollasch 5y ago
So naturally, my knee-jerk reaction is to create some kind of checklist language and interpreter. Which is almost wrong, of course.
I say "almost", because it occurs to me that many steps are shared individually across many different workflows. If you see a single task as an automation target, then you end up writing simple scripts that perform very focused operations -- a strong advantage over a large complicated script that does many different things, some that are repeated for other complicated scripts.
In this setup, you end up with checklists that remain forever, with automation replacing some or all of the print commands.
Of course, my spidey sense tells me that I've just pushed the problem down a level, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯.