4 ms·
Thanks for taking a look. We don't promote NUM as decentralised, but it has that potential with enough independent adoption. We talk about NUM as an alternati
by elliottinvent 5y ago
Thanks for taking a look.
We don't promote NUM as decentralised, but it has that potential with enough independent adoption.
We talk about NUM as an alternative to centralised APIs for two reasons: (a) it can be adopted independently; (b) there are no rate limits or restrictions, which we see as the big problems with APIs.
I agree, some big endorsements would be good but I don't think that'll drive adoption on the domain side.
The point of num.net is that we don't need wholesale adoption on the domain side, we need adoption on the developer side (and by extension users) to drive adoption on the domain side – either by people claiming their records on num.net or publishing independent records.