4 ms·
>What kind of argument is that? An argument based on human history and the progress of human rights? >They spread lies which cost lives. Precisely the same a
by motherzucker 5y ago
>What kind of argument is that?
An argument based on human history and the progress of human rights?
>They spread lies which cost lives.
Precisely the same argument used time and time again against the thought leaders of human rights.
- Krasnol 5y ago> An argument based on human history and the progress of human rights? This is not what I meant and you know it. > Precisely the same argument used time and time again against the thought leaders of human rights. This is utter bullshit and derailment. People who spread misinformation about covid are wrong. There are scientific facts which prove them wrong. The fact that they repeat something against those facts doesn't make them heroes because there was Copernicus who was also "against something". Copernicus had the facts side behind him. Those guys you try to advertise here are the church which was against him because they had THE FEELING that he was wrong and no scientific facts which would support them.