3 ms·

Your take is completely wrong, OP didn't make it "political", he said Pfizer falsified data and your post confirms that.

• ceejayoz 5y ago
  > he said Pfizer falsified data Which is an assertion the BMJ article doesn't support. "Revelations of poor practices at a contract research company helping to carry out Pfizer’s pivotal covid-19 vaccine trial raise questions about data integrity and regulatory oversight. Paul D Thacker reports" "A regional director who was employed at the research organisation Ventavia Research Group has told The BMJ that the company falsified data, unblinded patients, employed inadequately trained vaccinators, and was slow to follow up on adverse events reported in Pfizer’s pivotal phase III trial."
  • throwawaymedia 5y ago
    > Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “Go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One of them was “verbally counseled for changing data and not noting late entry,” a note indicates. > At several points during the late September meeting Jackson and the Ventavia executives discussed the possibility of the FDA showing up for an inspection (box 1). “We’re going to get some kind of letter of information at least, when the FDA gets here... know it,” an executive stated.
    • ceejayoz 5y ago
      > Ventavia > Ventavia You're aware that Pfizer isn't spelled V-E-N-T-A-V-I-A, yes?