3 ms·
I would rather see SCTP, I mean, something standard, than a hack up on top of existing protocols, even if that's slower to implement. Now then again SPDY is in
by zobzu 15y ago
I would rather see SCTP, I mean, something standard, than a hack up on top of existing protocols, even if that's slower to implement.
Now then again SPDY is indeed fast and encrypted
This is also interesting:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=spdy https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=spdy
- andfarm 15y agoSCTP is at a different layer of the network stack -- it's a replacement for TCP, not for HTTP. As such, it's much more difficult to deploy, as it currently requires a kernel extension in most OSes, and can't traverse most firewalls. Also, it isn't encrypted. So there's that too.