3 ms·
I fidn many mirrorless cameras don't have anywhere near as good physical handling characteristics. I am a Canon guy and I'd rather deal with my full size dslr
by LegitShady 5y ago
I fidn many mirrorless cameras don't have anywhere near as good physical handling characteristics. I am a Canon guy and I'd rather deal with my full size dslr over my tiny canon mirrorless...and it's not like the mirrorless is small once you add a 17-40. Or 24-70 on to it. They're just not as ergonomic and convenient to stabilize - I use a shoulder stabilized style when using a 70-200 and just can't pull it off with a mirrorless camera.
The mirrorless cam tends to just be a travel camera and only sees the 14mm pancake lens on it most of the time.
- petre 5y agoCanon also has the R5 and R6, these are full sized mirrorless cameras that one could use large lenses on. And there are also acessory grips.
- FireBeyond 5y agoI own a 5D4 and an R5. I haven't really used the R5 more than a few times, but I'm already having a hard time going back to my 5D4, between features and everything. Battery is less of an issue for me because I've typically used the battery grip, on either. For more compact travel stuff, I bought a Leica Q a few years ago, that has a fixed 28mm.