3 ms·
I think complexity is an aspect that need to be considered here... I personally would feel like instead of spending 10 years working on something that will be c
by ordiel 5y ago
I think complexity is an aspect that need to be considered here... I personally would feel like instead of spending 10 years working on something that will be copied so someone else takes the benefit I would much rather not to inovate and waste that time.
Similar as to how google did steal the JVM claimimg that just because they "added" "some" memory features they suddenly revolutionized the entire thing... Bullshit specially being open sourced they could have easily added those features so that THE ENTIRETY of the java/jvm ecosystem could benefit from such improvements, even in desktop, ALSO allowing what now we even came to know as "android apps" to run in other platforms since well at the end... It just a jvm. A move which by the way has become even much clearer now that they are changing the tratitional packaging format (casually) now that android apps begin running on other devises. Its clear it's intent was to get a bunch of already well trained coding monkeys by effectively copying the entire API so they could quickly ease adoption of their platform without giving back to the same jvm community that they copied/reused to make billions
Sadly the person choosen to explain this at the SCOTUS was too stupid and not technical enough to put this into words