Why do you people keep arguing against yourself? That very article says: > “It is not yet clear whether he participated actively in the theft or if he simply d

Why do you people keep arguing against yourself? That very article says: > “It is not yet clear whether he participated actively in the theft or if he simply decided not to increase security measures after discovering it,” Ivano Gabrielli, director of the national centre for cyber crimes, said in Reuters' report. How does that prove anything? What's happening with HN users making baseless accusations? What happened with providing hard evidence to what you're stating?