4 ms·
> at least since they made their own judgements they can be reasoned with You've made the mistaken assumption here that the people making their own judgments m
by crooked-v 5y ago
> at least since they made their own judgements they can be reasoned with
You've made the mistaken assumption here that the people making their own judgments must be using reason to do so.
- Jensson 5y agoI am not convinced that there actually are a lot of such people you described. I think the people you meet who are hard to argue with are that way since they just listen to authority and repeats what their authority source told them. A naïve take would be that the person is arrogant and doesn't listen since he trusts himself too much, but in this case the problem is that the person is too humble and listened too much to his leader instead of thinking for himself in this argument.
- notsureaboutpg 5y agoAlex Jones is impossible to argue with. He's not humble and not following anybody for sure.
- lotsofpulp 5y ago> A naïve take would be that the person is arrogant and doesn't listen since he trusts himself too much, but in this case the problem is that the person is too humble and listened too much to his leader instead of thinking for himself in this argument. A naive take would be to give all authority sources the same amount of weight. No one is capable of knowing everything and making proper judgments. Everyday people have to rely on others’ judgments. You can look for signs that something is off, but for the most part, you will have to trust others. In a well functioning society, most of the time, this will work out in your favor.