6 ms·

I recently bought a secondhand Original DJI Mavic Pro for chump change. For someone who knew nothing about drones it staggered me. For something so technologica

I recently bought a secondhand Original DJI Mavic Pro for chump change. For someone who knew nothing about drones it staggered me. For something so technologically advanced to be considered 'old' tech (manufactured 2017) is just unreal. It is now my frame of reference for all sorts of technology. Automatically not crashing, auto return to home, insane maneuverability on sport mode and all at a bizarrely low price for something that would have seemed science fiction to many punters 20 years ago. By commoditizing this kind of consumer tech that interfaces with the real world, DJI has changed my perception of what existing technology could be capable of and changed the way I consider usability in my own work.

darknavi 5y ago
I have a Mavic Pro from a few years ago. Still runs like a champ. The biggest draw for me to get a new one at some point would be the flight time per battery. My Mavic Pro gets ~20 minutes and the newer ones seem to get ~30 or more. Not a huge deal with a bank of batteries, but it will be nice ones my drone eventually kicks the bucket.
latchkey 5y ago
If you really want to blow your mind, buy a used DJI FPV next and then put it into full manual mode...
- InvertedRhodium 5y ago
  It'd blow their mind how easy it is to crash in manual mode with no experience.
  - FPGAhacker 5y ago
    Definitely this. Use a simulator for a while first.
  - latchkey 5y ago
    One neat thing is that it has what I call the "oh shit button". If you feel like you're going to crash, hit the button and disables manual mode, rights itself and hovers in place. Near immediately. As long as you have your finger on that button (and practice using it), it is a pretty safe way to learn. Best to go in manual mode with a bit of height and in an open area first too.
- mclightning 5y ago
  I'm all on board with DJI FPV except for the fact, it is an acrobatic drone with proprietary parts which will be costly to replace... I want same feature-set on a DIY frame, or at least DIY-able.
  - ryanlol 5y ago
    >acrobatic aerobatic, surely?
    - latchkey 5y ago
      DJI FPV is acrobatic, the thing can do flips when it is in full manual mode. It is pretty amazing, but definitely requires some experience flying drones.
      - ryanlol 5y ago
        Excuse my pedantry, but in an aviation context this is referred to as “aerobatics” while “acrobatics” refers to feats of the human body. Just some meaningless trivia.
- stavros 5y ago
  Don't, you'll certainly crash pretty soon and you'll basically have to buy a new one. If you want to try FPV, get an FPV quad, which is an open ecosystem and much cheaper (though not nearly as plug-and-play, granted).
  - Steltek 5y ago
    DJI and FPV are two different hobbies, IMO. Either you want a slow-and-steady flying camera or you want to feel like you're actually flying an insanely maneuverable aircraft. And yeah, the FPV ecosystem with interchangeable parts and open source code is eye opening. It's like building a desktop and installing Linux yourself vs buying a tablet. Mind you, your desktop won't fall out of the sky and shatter into pieces. But it's fun!
    - lebed2045 5y ago
      +1 to that. I started by FPV hobby about a year ago (just regular analog tinywhoop). So it's 30% flying hobby, and 70% tinkering around and learn: 1) how to solder, 2) how how charge and use lipo batteries, 3) how antennas work, polarisation, connectors etc, 4) what all these buzzwords in betaflight means 5) binding, expressLRS setting, 6) 3d printing protection parts, 7) even there are different connectors standards!, etc so it's whole umbrella of little hobbies that comes with it. At least for me it's lots of fun, because it takes a few hours of learning time and you get working result. But it's not for everyone for sure. Drastic different with PnP experience of DJI drones.
    - stavros 5y ago
      > DJI and FPV are two different hobbies, IMO Yes, but the DJI FPV that the GP mentioned is an FPV quad.
      - Steltek 5y ago
        DJI has a quad called "FPV" but that doesn't mean it's the FPV hobby. I can replace an arm on my quad for $2 vs some absurd money for DJI Care plus time spent waiting for shipping back and forth. Now let's blow up some ESCs or crack the camera on a rock...
ehnto 5y ago
I had a similar epiphany except it has driven me to consider a new industry, as I can't possibly hope to solve the state of my current one and frankly don't want to, they made their own bed. The capabilities present when you own the whole stack and make a point of offering safety and robustness really makes the behavior present in other industries almost embarassing. Drones are science fiction dreams come true. But more than that, they offer a really tangible way to work through software and hardware to as you say, interface with the world. It's a really exciting space and I was initially really skeptical, but as their practcal uses outside of just a camera in the sky become more achievable it became clear to me that I want to get involved.
- ur-whale 5y ago
  > outside of just a camera in the sky This sounds a little dismissive ... a camera in the sky is a tremendously useful tool. There are of course the art application, the "make memories" application that can be perceived as nice but not that important. But how about: search and rescue, automated land surveying, 3D reconstruction of buildings and landscape, understanding the impact of new architectural projects on the environment, etc ... ? Combine the "just a camera in the sky" with ML and that's a lot of new applications (and therefore business opportunities).
  - ehnto 5y ago
    Oh I didn't mean to be dismissive, I am extremely impressed with the possibilities said eye in the sky can provide, I guess I meant that it's more useful than a hobby photography tool. I of course think that is really rad too since it's what I do with my drone now. But the commercial side of the industry is getting really exciting with exactly the kind of tools you're talking about, some of which are just new ways of applying the camera like you're pointing out. Ag spraying, high definition cinematography, industrial inspections, affordable localized LIDAR scanning, even underground mine surveys are all super interesting to me.
WrtCdEvrydy 5y ago
Wait till someone shows you a Skydio 2 drone (look around, there's probably a drone pilot that uses one).
- subhro 5y ago
  Only 23 mins? That is not terribly useful at least for any serious matters like, say, search and rescue operations.
  - amcoastal 5y ago
    You're getting downvoted because your complaint makes it seem like this is a problem with the particular model. 23 minutes is probably even above average for drone flight times. Don't be so kneejerk negative.
  - dylan604 5y ago
    Sounds like youre using the wrong tool for the task at hand. However, it also sounds like you've never personally experienced the ~23 minutes of flight time and the amount of ground that can be covered. It's way more impressive than you are dismissing.
  - comeonseriously 5y ago
    >... say, search and rescue operations. Oh good grief. If that is the use case, you get something designed for that.
  - some_random 5y ago
    That's incredible, it's almost as if it's not optimized for search and rescue.
fsloth 5y ago
And it's incredibly robust! Mine has spent total I think a week on a tree. First time it was climbed down. The second time climbing was not feasible. Luckily a storm blew it down after a week or so. The bad part was it landed on sharp steel debris. But it did not have a dent in it. I presume it landed on it's battery, which was missing, which probably then absorbed most of the energy from the fall. After all this abuse it's still flying like a champ. I think DJI probably had some quality control issues on at least on the original batch (first I got had lots of problems) but their service reps simply sent a replacement for no charge. The second one has had no problems.
- Filligree 5y ago
  If you do ever damage it, you can send it to DJI and they’ll give you an itemised repair bill, which will be much cheaper than a new drone. This isn’t the usual throwaway consumer hardware. The drone is designed to be repaired.
- TedShiller 5y ago
  So you don’t think littering the environment with a battery encased in plastic is a big deal?
  - fsloth 5y ago
    Why would you think I abandoned it on purpose? The crash site was a pile of steel beams and other debris from a demolished building. Do you have suggestions what else I could have done except search for it?

darknavi 5y ago

I have a Mavic Pro from a few years ago. Still runs like a champ. The biggest draw for me to get a new one at some point would be the flight time per battery. My Mavic Pro gets ~20 minutes and the newer ones seem to get ~30 or more. Not a huge deal with a bank of batteries, but it will be nice ones my drone eventually kicks the bucket.

latchkey 5y ago

If you really want to blow your mind, buy a used DJI FPV next and then put it into full manual mode...

InvertedRhodium 5y ago
It'd blow their mind how easy it is to crash in manual mode with no experience.
- FPGAhacker 5y ago
  Definitely this. Use a simulator for a while first.
- latchkey 5y ago
  One neat thing is that it has what I call the "oh shit button". If you feel like you're going to crash, hit the button and disables manual mode, rights itself and hovers in place. Near immediately. As long as you have your finger on that button (and practice using it), it is a pretty safe way to learn. Best to go in manual mode with a bit of height and in an open area first too.
mclightning 5y ago
I'm all on board with DJI FPV except for the fact, it is an acrobatic drone with proprietary parts which will be costly to replace... I want same feature-set on a DIY frame, or at least DIY-able.
- ryanlol 5y ago
  >acrobatic aerobatic, surely?
  - latchkey 5y ago
    DJI FPV is acrobatic, the thing can do flips when it is in full manual mode. It is pretty amazing, but definitely requires some experience flying drones.
    - ryanlol 5y ago
      Excuse my pedantry, but in an aviation context this is referred to as “aerobatics” while “acrobatics” refers to feats of the human body. Just some meaningless trivia.
stavros 5y ago
Don't, you'll certainly crash pretty soon and you'll basically have to buy a new one. If you want to try FPV, get an FPV quad, which is an open ecosystem and much cheaper (though not nearly as plug-and-play, granted).
- Steltek 5y ago
  DJI and FPV are two different hobbies, IMO. Either you want a slow-and-steady flying camera or you want to feel like you're actually flying an insanely maneuverable aircraft. And yeah, the FPV ecosystem with interchangeable parts and open source code is eye opening. It's like building a desktop and installing Linux yourself vs buying a tablet. Mind you, your desktop won't fall out of the sky and shatter into pieces. But it's fun!
  - lebed2045 5y ago
    +1 to that. I started by FPV hobby about a year ago (just regular analog tinywhoop). So it's 30% flying hobby, and 70% tinkering around and learn: 1) how to solder, 2) how how charge and use lipo batteries, 3) how antennas work, polarisation, connectors etc, 4) what all these buzzwords in betaflight means 5) binding, expressLRS setting, 6) 3d printing protection parts, 7) even there are different connectors standards!, etc so it's whole umbrella of little hobbies that comes with it. At least for me it's lots of fun, because it takes a few hours of learning time and you get working result. But it's not for everyone for sure. Drastic different with PnP experience of DJI drones.
  - stavros 5y ago
    > DJI and FPV are two different hobbies, IMO Yes, but the DJI FPV that the GP mentioned is an FPV quad.
    - Steltek 5y ago
      DJI has a quad called "FPV" but that doesn't mean it's the FPV hobby. I can replace an arm on my quad for $2 vs some absurd money for DJI Care plus time spent waiting for shipping back and forth. Now let's blow up some ESCs or crack the camera on a rock...

ehnto 5y ago

I had a similar epiphany except it has driven me to consider a new industry, as I can't possibly hope to solve the state of my current one and frankly don't want to, they made their own bed. The capabilities present when you own the whole stack and make a point of offering safety and robustness really makes the behavior present in other industries almost embarassing. Drones are science fiction dreams come true. But more than that, they offer a really tangible way to work through software and hardware to as you say, interface with the world. It's a really exciting space and I was initially really skeptical, but as their practcal uses outside of just a camera in the sky become more achievable it became clear to me that I want to get involved.

ur-whale 5y ago
> outside of just a camera in the sky This sounds a little dismissive ... a camera in the sky is a tremendously useful tool. There are of course the art application, the "make memories" application that can be perceived as nice but not that important. But how about: search and rescue, automated land surveying, 3D reconstruction of buildings and landscape, understanding the impact of new architectural projects on the environment, etc ... ? Combine the "just a camera in the sky" with ML and that's a lot of new applications (and therefore business opportunities).
- ehnto 5y ago
  Oh I didn't mean to be dismissive, I am extremely impressed with the possibilities said eye in the sky can provide, I guess I meant that it's more useful than a hobby photography tool. I of course think that is really rad too since it's what I do with my drone now. But the commercial side of the industry is getting really exciting with exactly the kind of tools you're talking about, some of which are just new ways of applying the camera like you're pointing out. Ag spraying, high definition cinematography, industrial inspections, affordable localized LIDAR scanning, even underground mine surveys are all super interesting to me.

WrtCdEvrydy 5y ago

Wait till someone shows you a Skydio 2 drone (look around, there's probably a drone pilot that uses one).

subhro 5y ago
Only 23 mins? That is not terribly useful at least for any serious matters like, say, search and rescue operations.
- amcoastal 5y ago
  You're getting downvoted because your complaint makes it seem like this is a problem with the particular model. 23 minutes is probably even above average for drone flight times. Don't be so kneejerk negative.
- dylan604 5y ago
  Sounds like youre using the wrong tool for the task at hand. However, it also sounds like you've never personally experienced the ~23 minutes of flight time and the amount of ground that can be covered. It's way more impressive than you are dismissing.
- comeonseriously 5y ago
  >... say, search and rescue operations. Oh good grief. If that is the use case, you get something designed for that.
- some_random 5y ago
  That's incredible, it's almost as if it's not optimized for search and rescue.

fsloth 5y ago

And it's incredibly robust! Mine has spent total I think a week on a tree. First time it was climbed down. The second time climbing was not feasible. Luckily a storm blew it down after a week or so. The bad part was it landed on sharp steel debris. But it did not have a dent in it. I presume it landed on it's battery, which was missing, which probably then absorbed most of the energy from the fall. After all this abuse it's still flying like a champ. I think DJI probably had some quality control issues on at least on the original batch (first I got had lots of problems) but their service reps simply sent a replacement for no charge. The second one has had no problems.

Filligree 5y ago
If you do ever damage it, you can send it to DJI and they’ll give you an itemised repair bill, which will be much cheaper than a new drone. This isn’t the usual throwaway consumer hardware. The drone is designed to be repaired.
TedShiller 5y ago
So you don’t think littering the environment with a battery encased in plastic is a big deal?
- fsloth 5y ago
  Why would you think I abandoned it on purpose? The crash site was a pile of steel beams and other debris from a demolished building. Do you have suggestions what else I could have done except search for it?