4 ms·
From my understanding, this is not correct. 401K contributions reduce your marginal tax rate. So if you make 100k and contribute 15k, you save about 24% in ta
by derekp7 5y ago
From my understanding, this is not correct. 401K contributions reduce your marginal tax rate. So if you make 100k and contribute 15k, you save about 24% in taxes. Then when you withdraw 100k a year during retirement, you pay only 18% in taxes.
On top of that, since you are only feeling a 11k reduction in your paycheck per year, but investing 15k, you end up with that much higher growth overall starting with a higher base.
The only time expected retirement withdraw rate (treated as income at that time) matters is when choosing between Roth and traditional 401k / IRAs. In that case, with Roth you are contributing a lower amount initially (11k reduction in pay = 11k invested, instead of 15k invested), however the interest grows tax free. So if you are investing enough that the interest gives you a huge amount of money during retirement such that your annual retirement income (using 4% rule) gives you much higher pay, you would be better with Roth. But in no case are you better without any tax advantaged account.
- creatornator 5y agoI think this is what they were saying--pre-tax refers to traditional, post-tax to roth. Only traditional ira/401k reduces the marginal tax rate. So the decision to go for traditional or roth depends on how you expect your tax bracket to change.