3 ms·
How can there be defense against this? The US does this but the military contracts aren't executed shoddily, although it seems that many others are. Why would
by GhettoComputers 5y ago
How can there be defense against this? The US does this but the military contracts aren't executed shoddily, although it seems that many others are.
Why would they make such a crappy program, don't they have any incentive to have a good reputation or to get more contracts? If it sucks and their history sucks, why would anyone want to hire them?
- floren 5y ago> The US does this but the military contracts aren't executed shoddily Did we finally decide to stop shoveling money into the F-35 or is that still ongoing?
- GhettoComputers 5y agoIs it bad? I don't know whats the problems with it.
- henrikschroder 5y agoPublic procurement requiring tax-funded projects to go to the lowest bidder is how this system is defended. There's a whole industry of companies who cater to these kinds of projects, and they don't give a shit about their reputation, because they're busy making sweet, sweet, money. And if you think US military contractors aren't wasteful and shoddy, I have a bridge to sell you!
- GhettoComputers 5y agoI don't think all of them are done shoddily, but the US has the most powerful military, so they must be at least less bad, after all a lot of powerful military vehicles were contracted like the SR-71.
- henrikschroder 5y ago> so they must be at least less bad Not necessarily, because they're throwing the most amount of money at the problem.