3 ms·
It's still under development, this paper proposes it as an enhancement for Cassandra, so benchmarks are a way off. Given its properties it is likely to have sim
by _benedict 5y ago
It's still under development, this paper proposes it as an enhancement for Cassandra, so benchmarks are a way off. Given its properties it is likely to have similar performance to Tempo and Caesar for consensus (perhaps lower throughput than Tempo but better latency than Caesar). It is not dissimilar to Calvin for multi-shard execution, trading away the NxN sequencing layer (and poor failure properties) for dependency tracking.
- jimsimmons 5y agoPerfect. Will dig through it! I didn't realise leaderless protocols are less robust and the paper sets up the situation quite well.
- _benedict 5y agoThanks, glad to hear it is helpful. Do let me know if you have any feedback, particularly that might help clarify things.