>This is a pretty naïve argument. Well there are certainly different degrees of ``inclusionism'' but I have read plenty argue that absolutely nothing is too tr

>This is a pretty naïve argument. Well there are certainly different degrees of ``inclusionism'' but I have read plenty argue that absolutely nothing is too trivial for Wikipedia. I don't care who's wrong or right, but given the standard the Foundation is attempting to set for themselves, it's clear to me why ``deletionism'' rules.