Concur. There's a good argument in the article, and a useless one. The useless one is the one you perceived. The good argument is that there are an array of ch

Concur. There's a good argument in the article, and a useless one. The useless one is the one you perceived. The good argument is that there are an array of characteristics that tend -- in various combinations and degrees -- to correspond to places people like. The correlation can be anecdotal, empirical, whatever, that's up to the writer, who should have made a case, not a whinge.