3 ms·
I get frustrated with the reaction to New Yorker pieces on here. Yes, a New Yorker piece is going to be long and have backstory. Their feature pieces are like
by adamgordonbell 5y ago
I get frustrated with the reaction to New Yorker pieces on here. Yes, a New Yorker piece is going to be long and have backstory.
Their feature pieces are like novellas of non-fiction. Many get republished into books, that receive acclaim like the amazing Coming into the Country[1].
It doesn't skim as well as some business insider article that is just a list of bullet points, but it was never meant to.
https://www.amazon.ca/Coming-into-Country-John-McPhee/dp/0374522871 https://www.amazon.ca/Coming-into-Country-John-McPhee/dp/037...
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1977/06/20/coming-into-the-countryi https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1977/06/20/coming-into-th...
- Mimmy 5y agoExactly. If you're going into a New Yorker article you should know what to expect.
- plutonorm 5y agoI very much enjoy the opportunity to use my right brain for a change. The style lends itself to 'feeling' the subject as much as describing it. This article especially invokes a kind of dreamy inexactitude that perfectly matches with the semi woo of the underlying topic. Intuition is the gift, reason the faithful servant - a view that most programers will disagree with imo.
- 3pt14159 5y agoThe New Yorker has some absolutely great pieces and a huge budget for journalism, but that said, I find their writers self-indulge a bit more than I find pleasant. The Walrus doesn't have as many block buster journalistic pieces, but the writing is strong and strikes a better balance between flourish and meat.
- Zababa 5y agoWhile I agree with you, not every writer is as good as John McPhee.
- exolymph 5y agoMost of the pieces don't earn the frippery they're draped in.