3 ms·
Its quite similar percentages to about a 10-15 difference of IQ points at end of the distribution curve. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_distributio
by lgrapenthin 5y ago
Its quite similar percentages to about a 10-15 difference of IQ points at end of the distribution curve.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_distribution.svg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:IQ_distribution.svg
- deworms 5y agoYou'd expect more intelligent people to prefer a tool that doesn't require days of tuning to start being remotely usable though
- rich_sasha 5y agoJokes aside, definitely not a day's worth of tuning. My minimal set-up is mostly hiding all the GUI elements. Though I also make a semi-virtue out of trying to use as much vanilla Emacs as possible, for this very reason. If you know your way around it, there's a lot of power in unmodded Emacs still.
- SauciestGNU 5y agoStuff like electric pairs, rainbow delimeters, rjsx-mode, prettier, and neotree are really all I use. I started using emacs because of auctex writing my master's thesis, and ended up switching from vim because of the experience. Once you know the basics about packaging (enabling melpa) and setting a comfortable theme you're pretty much ready to roll.
- SauciestGNU 5y agoPrefacing with that I don't think iq is the best way to measure intelligence, but I wonder what the intelligence distribution of tinkerers is. The sort of person who might sit down to learn emacs because it's a blank functional canvas that you can customize to meet your particular needs.
- rich_sasha 5y agoYou made my day! :)
- sidr 5y agoAny probability distribution of any attribute can be aribtrarily cut off at the 90th or 85th percentiles to make this point. Are you claiming there's something special that relates integer multiples of standard deviation of the IQ distribution to emacs usage?