There are certainly some companies that pose as doing good while doing mostly good for themselves, but the inherent concept of what you're saying is incorrect.

There are certainly some companies that pose as doing good while doing mostly good for themselves, but the inherent concept of what you're saying is incorrect. A founder that builds massive wealth and then uses that money to create widespread changes for good can do far more than the same person just volunteering their time. Example: donating $2M to an organization that feeds the homeless makes a bigger impact than even 10 years of working the soup line. Both are important, but in most cases the 2nd person can't even do their job without the donation from the 1st.