3 ms·

Why is it worth reading if it’s such a bad article?

• hdjjhhvvhga 5y ago
  Just because of the points the interviewer fails to address or addresses poorly. I bet many of us witnessed similar discussions; here, the arguments of both sides are exposed and you can see their weak points. Some of these give me food for thought.
  • WalterGR 5y ago
    If the interviewer addresses the points so poorly, isn’t the article basically then just a straw man argument in favor of the interviewee’s side? If the subject is worth discussing, then it’s worth discussing a source with good arguments presented by each side.
• LurkingPenguin 5y ago
  Personally, I think occasionally reading poorly-written/flawed articles is a good way to keep one's critical thinking skills (and BS detector) honed. If we only consume content that we believe is well-written and logically consistent if not persuasive, or that we agree with, I believe our critical thinking skills atrophy.