3 ms·
This is the best kind of correct but it's an interesting phrasing since Fredkin is a kind of Quantum supremacy skeptic (hotkey-find Classicatopia in: https://wi
by Cybiote 5y ago
This is the best kind of correct but it's an interesting phrasing since Fredkin is a kind of Quantum supremacy skeptic (hotkey-find Classicatopia in: https://windowsontheory.org/2017/10/30/the-different-forms-of-quantum-computing-skepticism/ https://windowsontheory.org/2017/10/30/the-different-forms-o...).
Fredkin's contribution were to reversible computation and since Quantum computers are a kind of reversible computer, many ideas and gate notions carried over.
- danbmil99 5y agoI agree, that is a more accurate description of Ed's work & opinion re Q-computing
- danbmil99 5y agoI guess you can ask, can someone be a significant contributor to a field they don't believe in? Didn't Einstein contribute to Quantum Mechanics, while simultaneously harboring grave misgivings? (God doesn't play dice etc)