14 ms·
I know you're entirely right, but sometimes when I see things like this in Typescript... https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/blob/main/source/require-at-
by debaserab2 5y ago
I know you're entirely right, but sometimes when I see things like this in Typescript...
https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/blob/main/source/require-at-least-one.d.ts#L25-L35 https://github.com/sindresorhus/type-fest/blob/main/source/r...
I can walk through it with enough pause, but it kinda makes my head implode when I glance at it.
- JZumun 5y ago{ [Key in KeysType]-?: ... } TIL that you can disable ? and readonly in mapped types using -. So in the above code, every Key will be mandatory (-?) even if the original one in KeysType was optional. source: https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/mapped-types.html#mapping-modifiers https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/mapped-types....
- codyb 5y agoYea it’s like reading Shakespeare… I can read the words and know what most of them mean… but damn if it doesn’t take serious energy to actually parse out the meaning sometimes. I guess in a way, the issue is that it is cloaked with familiarity. Your brain gets so used to understanding sentences on first go it’s not used to not understanding it. However, if it was a chemistry equation and you weren’t familiar with chemistry it would immediately understand that comprehension would take time and thus the mind implosion due to a lack of understanding doesn’t occur.