4 ms·
You’re expecting an audience with a lot of power if you’re asking such things. I don’t think the majority of the readers of this comment can afford to take such
by joeman1000 5y ago
You’re expecting an audience with a lot of power if you’re asking such things. I don’t think the majority of the readers of this comment can afford to take such risks, and if they do it’s unlikely to get them anywhere. Power corrupts. What do you mean you can engineer processes? How will you get anybody to follow your rules? Your comment ranges from naïve to unhinged.
- OneTimePetes 5y agoIts correct, that moving "within" the system, changes are not possible. You could create a one-purpose-party, which has a updated "constitution" as proposal with a feature freeze on the proposal, that fixes the flaws. Then gather the votes and fix it. The eldest democracy we have right now is 300 years old, changes are possible - and patch is welcome.