5 ms·

Perhaps I'm a huge outlier, but i don't remember almost anything before the age of 5 or 6... I guest this practice may leave some subtle trauma, but it's for s

by kome 5y ago

Perhaps I'm a huge outlier, but i don't remember almost anything before the age of 5 or 6... I guest this practice may leave some subtle trauma, but it's for sure something that is adjusted later, leaving no or little trace. I have been to Tajikistan, working in education (university): the kids are doing fine.

causi 5y ago
Conscious memory is a tiny portion of the mind, like the place-setting at a dinner table. This is screwing with the boards in the walls of the house.
jhncls 5y ago
It is well-known that neglect during early infancy has a strong life-long negative effect. The argument that one doesn't remember much from before age 5 doesn't impede early infancy having a huge effect on emotional and physical development. If cradling would have a net-positive effect on children, evolution would probably have spread the practice world-wide. [0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702123/ [1] https://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/neglect https://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/neglect
- kome 5y ago
  cradling is not neglect, two very different things
- owenmarshall 5y ago
  The paper indicates that Tajik infants are hardly neglected: they are attended to quickly if they cry, and are considered a very important part of the family and overall community and are interacted with accordingly.
  - mc32 5y ago
    I don't think poster is claiming it's neglect. What they seem to say is while one as an infant rarely can consciously recall neglect, it does not mean that neglect has no long term effect and that a similar thing _could_ happen here. We just don't have studies one way or another, though anecdotally there does not seem to be any long term negative effects with cradling.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- tsol 5y ago
  This would be the opposite of neglect. What we do is, comparatively, neglect since we let kids run around. Good knows a certain number of our children under two injure themselves getting into trouble while parents are distracted, sometimes fatally.

by kome 5y ago

causi 5y ago

Conscious memory is a tiny portion of the mind, like the place-setting at a dinner table. This is screwing with the boards in the walls of the house.

jhncls 5y ago

It is well-known that neglect during early infancy has a strong life-long negative effect. The argument that one doesn't remember much from before age 5 doesn't impede early infancy having a huge effect on emotional and physical development. If cradling would have a net-positive effect on children, evolution would probably have spread the practice world-wide. [0] https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702123/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2702123/ [1] https://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/neglect https://www.apa.org/monitor/2014/06/neglect

kome 5y ago
cradling is not neglect, two very different things
owenmarshall 5y ago
The paper indicates that Tajik infants are hardly neglected: they are attended to quickly if they cry, and are considered a very important part of the family and overall community and are interacted with accordingly.
- mc32 5y ago
  I don't think poster is claiming it's neglect. What they seem to say is while one as an infant rarely can consciously recall neglect, it does not mean that neglect has no long term effect and that a similar thing _could_ happen here. We just don't have studies one way or another, though anecdotally there does not seem to be any long term negative effects with cradling.
deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
tsol 5y ago
This would be the opposite of neglect. What we do is, comparatively, neglect since we let kids run around. Good knows a certain number of our children under two injure themselves getting into trouble while parents are distracted, sometimes fatally.