14 ms·
Yes, but he's "arguing against it" by reshaping it into a ridiculously extreme and self-evidently-false form. It's an intellectually dishonest and particularly
by hugh3 15y ago
Yes, but he's "arguing against it" by reshaping it into a ridiculously extreme and self-evidently-false form.
It's an intellectually dishonest and particularly annoying (yet extremely common) way to argue.
- Goladus 15y agoIt's a 4 paragraph blog entry meant to be funny and make you think a little bit. It's not trying to be anything more than that. "Intellectually dishonest" is an unfair charge.