2 ms·
nim is good, and I was onboard when it was nimrod (liked that name better!). It's very good. Here's where my supposedly polyglot objectivity falls prey to subje
by eggy 5y ago
nim is good, and I was onboard when it was nimrod (liked that name better!). It's very good. Here's where my supposedly polyglot objectivity falls prey to subjective syntax like/dislike. I am not a fan of python's syntax, so nim resonated the same with me. I really love APL/J and Lisp. If Haskell had more uptake in the pragmatic world with a cohesive ecosystem, and more libraries, I would probably be all in. Nim has the ability to --gc:none, so maybe I should take a look again. I found a few libraries, but there didn't seem to be many in machine learning/optimization.