7 ms·
Possible. Or perhaps it's that the company has engaged in systematic malfeasance, unethical business practices, and has profoundly amoral leadership, resulting
by aaroninsf 5y ago
Possible.
Or perhaps it's that the company has engaged in systematic malfeasance, unethical business practices, and has profoundly amoral leadership, resulting in profoundly amoral behavior, culminating in knee jerk dishonesty, denial, and misdirection, and the systematic betrayal abuse and injury of their users, host societies, and culture at large.
- wutbrodo 5y agoWhat? This thread is about why Twitter has escaped (much) media criticism, not why Facebook has received it.