3 ms·
You seem to have missed the point of not just the article, but the OP. If you read the article, it advocates asynchronous conversation, and 'micro' updates. I
by 34523trefds12 5y ago
You seem to have missed the point of not just the article, but the OP.
If you read the article, it advocates asynchronous conversation, and 'micro' updates.
In other words rather than forcing people to update at a specific time, that whilst convenient for you, is not convenient for all we should consider allowing people to do what they need to do and empower them to respond appropriately.
This is why OP mentioned that _your_ daily ritual is hurting them, because you are _forcing_ them to adhere to what works for you at _their_ expense.
It also goes both ways, but we cannot ask one to always considers us, and allow their needs to go unattended because it doesn't fit our narrative.
- Talanes 5y ago>This is why OP mentioned that _your_ daily ritual is hurting them, because you are _forcing_ them to adhere to what works for you at _their_ expense. Technically true, but it's not like the "ritual" is some weird obscure requirement. Showing up on time is pretty much a default requirement of society. At least they're in a field where being slightly late results in embarrassment instead of firing.