5 ms·

When you are a company leader, your words can have a material effect on your business. This is doubly so true at a disruptive point like leadership exits. Of co

When you are a company leader, your words can have a material effect on your business. This is doubly so true at a disruptive point like leadership exits. Of course words are going to be delicately chosen? That being said I didn't notice anything particularly offensive about this letter. He describes the accomplishments under his watch, expresses gratitude for employees, and expresses confidence in his successor.

systemvoltage 5y ago
There is one particular corporate leader who speaks their mind and has made a tremendous impact on the world. So, it's not clear if it has anything to do with polished big-corp language. I'd rather listen to someone who is straightforward than Sundar Pichai speaking entirely in corporate-speak while saying absolutely nothing of value or substance. Completely uninspiring. All corporate speak is rather an invention of the 80's and 90's. Listen to corporate leaders from any other time before that.
- ghostly_s 5y ago
  Who is that?
  - __s 5y ago
    Musk
    - kreeben 5y ago
      It's funny to me that you think Musk isn't an "always-be-selling" type of person and that you think he speaks his mind without spewing "corporate speak" because to me, "Musk speak" is just another form of corporate speak. Musk isn't so much "speaking the truth", he's more "selling things, his way".
      - __s 5y ago
        That's cool; I was just answering ghostly_'s question as to whom systemvoltage was implying
      - jaywalk 5y ago
        You've essentially expanded the definition of "corporate speak" to be "anything a person in a leadership position says"
        Apocryphon 5y ago
        When you're a corporate leader, the way you speak is by default a form of corporate speak, because as a public figure who is listened to, everything you say is a reflection of the brand.
        jaywalk 5y ago
        No. Corporate speak is a specific way of speaking.
        kreeben 5y ago
        Will you agree with this? Corporate speak, definition: - to say what's in the best interest of the corporation, no matter what the circumstance - to not tell the truth, unless it's something that can become a huge PR success for the corporation - to not tell a lie, unless it's something that can become a huge PR success for the corporation For the "Musk speak" definition, simply replace "the corporation" with "Musk".
        Apocryphon 5y ago
        I think there's a specific "corporate style" of speaking that's very stiff and blandly positive, which is what they're thinking of when they're saying corporate speak. But I agree with your point and was making it, even though Musk speak is a different style, it ultimately works the same way as the corporate style, which is to buff up his brand in a way that maximizes shareholder value. Musk speak might not be the corporate style, but it's still a form of corporate speak, as per your definition.
    - ghostly_s 5y ago
      LOL, Github has made more impact on the world than Elon.
      - __s 5y ago
        ? systemvoltage made no comparison between impact of Musk & impact of GitHub
  - aerosmile 5y ago
    Elon Edit: lol, this will be the most downvotes on a char count basis I've ever received. I thought it was generally accepted that for better or worse, he does not mince words.
- scrubs 5y ago
  Agree. Corporate speak is un-open. It's a spin. It's pejorative because it's essentially manipulative. To get out of that and to work from one's own experience requires intelligence and some (not a ton) of confidence. If the putative speaker doesn't have that, how in the hell did he get into the top spot? To be sure, such plain speak also comes with a take, a slant, and frame. Is that manipulative? Not in the end: you see it coming. You see from whom it's coming. And the listener can assess how it lands. If there's a meeting of the minds, great. If not no harm, no-foul.
- approxim8ion 5y ago
  Why is one thing a corporate persona and the other "speaking their mind"? I think most CEOs are good at cultivating a personal brand that speaks to the people they want to be reaching out to. Musk is equally if not more pompous with his nuggets of wisdom, and offers no value or substance either.
- haliskerbas 5y ago
  Ah yes Elon Musk also tweets about “TITS university”. I’m sure there’s no one that finds issue with that, but doesn’t have the power to speak against it.
  - TeMPOraL 5y ago
    There are over 7 billion people on this planet. I'm sure that for every utterance you could construct in the English language, you could find someone who "finds issue with that, but doesn’t have the power to speak against it".
  - jaywalk 5y ago
    If someone finds issue with it but doesn't have the power to speak against it, then who cares that they find issue with it? If Elon was worried about making sure he didn't offend anyone, he wouldn't speak the way he does.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]
  - xibalba 5y ago
    People are entitled to their opinions, but I personally just can't take the pearl clutchers seriously in their offense-taking on this one. The framing on this as a demonstration of deep misogyny in tech is just way, way too morbidly absurd.
- yongjik 5y ago
  Can't deny that Musk is an incredibly successful man, but if it's the choice between Sundar Pichai's corporate speech and someone who attacks a rescue expert as "pedo guy" because his ego is hurt, I'd rather work for Pichai. I mean, if we can excuse Musk's behavior as "So what? His companies have been incredibly successful," then, fine, but why can't we say the same for other CEOs? Other CEOs at least have a good sense of keeping their personal feuds out of twitter.
  - hoseja 5y ago
    It was an old white SEA expat who attacked him first. And calling him "rescue expert" is charitable to say the least.
ksec 5y ago
Mostly started by Google as "Do No Evil" PR, and later by Apple's creating products that “enrich people's lives.” I dont think it is this letter in particular. So may be it is not fair to criticise it. But my guess is that the accumulation of these cooperate speaks, PR, and the past 10 years of main stream media riding along these PR to new height, just happen to tricker OP this time around. And it doesn't seems to be an American things either, I read a lot of Fortune 500 post, somehow these over the top PR speak are mostly related to tech only. However, I still think Github and Nat deserve a lot of praise for what they have done. Lots of changes and improvement happened after the acquisition. And not only credit to Nat but also to Microsoft.
- jaywalk 5y ago
  This stuff easily predates Google's founding, and isn't remotely limited to tech. It's been standard "big corporation" stuff for a very long time.
devmunchies 5y ago
> Of course words are going to be delicately chosen? that question mark at the end of a non-question. Nothing personal, just critique on a larger trend, but IMO upspeak and vocal fry are more annoying than corporate speak. But I agree about these exit letter being more delicate. The more intimate notes are fine internally.

systemvoltage 5y ago

There is one particular corporate leader who speaks their mind and has made a tremendous impact on the world. So, it's not clear if it has anything to do with polished big-corp language. I'd rather listen to someone who is straightforward than Sundar Pichai speaking entirely in corporate-speak while saying absolutely nothing of value or substance. Completely uninspiring. All corporate speak is rather an invention of the 80's and 90's. Listen to corporate leaders from any other time before that.

ghostly_s 5y ago
Who is that?
- __s 5y ago
  Musk
  - kreeben 5y ago
    It's funny to me that you think Musk isn't an "always-be-selling" type of person and that you think he speaks his mind without spewing "corporate speak" because to me, "Musk speak" is just another form of corporate speak. Musk isn't so much "speaking the truth", he's more "selling things, his way".
    - __s 5y ago
      That's cool; I was just answering ghostly_'s question as to whom systemvoltage was implying
    - jaywalk 5y ago
      You've essentially expanded the definition of "corporate speak" to be "anything a person in a leadership position says"
      - Apocryphon 5y ago
        When you're a corporate leader, the way you speak is by default a form of corporate speak, because as a public figure who is listened to, everything you say is a reflection of the brand.
        jaywalk 5y ago
        No. Corporate speak is a specific way of speaking.
        kreeben 5y ago
        Will you agree with this? Corporate speak, definition: - to say what's in the best interest of the corporation, no matter what the circumstance - to not tell the truth, unless it's something that can become a huge PR success for the corporation - to not tell a lie, unless it's something that can become a huge PR success for the corporation For the "Musk speak" definition, simply replace "the corporation" with "Musk".
        Apocryphon 5y ago
        I think there's a specific "corporate style" of speaking that's very stiff and blandly positive, which is what they're thinking of when they're saying corporate speak. But I agree with your point and was making it, even though Musk speak is a different style, it ultimately works the same way as the corporate style, which is to buff up his brand in a way that maximizes shareholder value. Musk speak might not be the corporate style, but it's still a form of corporate speak, as per your definition.
  - ghostly_s 5y ago
    LOL, Github has made more impact on the world than Elon.
    - __s 5y ago
      ? systemvoltage made no comparison between impact of Musk & impact of GitHub
- aerosmile 5y ago
  Elon Edit: lol, this will be the most downvotes on a char count basis I've ever received. I thought it was generally accepted that for better or worse, he does not mince words.
scrubs 5y ago
Agree. Corporate speak is un-open. It's a spin. It's pejorative because it's essentially manipulative. To get out of that and to work from one's own experience requires intelligence and some (not a ton) of confidence. If the putative speaker doesn't have that, how in the hell did he get into the top spot? To be sure, such plain speak also comes with a take, a slant, and frame. Is that manipulative? Not in the end: you see it coming. You see from whom it's coming. And the listener can assess how it lands. If there's a meeting of the minds, great. If not no harm, no-foul.
approxim8ion 5y ago
Why is one thing a corporate persona and the other "speaking their mind"? I think most CEOs are good at cultivating a personal brand that speaks to the people they want to be reaching out to. Musk is equally if not more pompous with his nuggets of wisdom, and offers no value or substance either.
haliskerbas 5y ago
Ah yes Elon Musk also tweets about “TITS university”. I’m sure there’s no one that finds issue with that, but doesn’t have the power to speak against it.
- TeMPOraL 5y ago
  There are over 7 billion people on this planet. I'm sure that for every utterance you could construct in the English language, you could find someone who "finds issue with that, but doesn’t have the power to speak against it".
- jaywalk 5y ago
  If someone finds issue with it but doesn't have the power to speak against it, then who cares that they find issue with it? If Elon was worried about making sure he didn't offend anyone, he wouldn't speak the way he does.
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]
- xibalba 5y ago
  People are entitled to their opinions, but I personally just can't take the pearl clutchers seriously in their offense-taking on this one. The framing on this as a demonstration of deep misogyny in tech is just way, way too morbidly absurd.
yongjik 5y ago
Can't deny that Musk is an incredibly successful man, but if it's the choice between Sundar Pichai's corporate speech and someone who attacks a rescue expert as "pedo guy" because his ego is hurt, I'd rather work for Pichai. I mean, if we can excuse Musk's behavior as "So what? His companies have been incredibly successful," then, fine, but why can't we say the same for other CEOs? Other CEOs at least have a good sense of keeping their personal feuds out of twitter.
- hoseja 5y ago
  It was an old white SEA expat who attacked him first. And calling him "rescue expert" is charitable to say the least.

ksec 5y ago

Mostly started by Google as "Do No Evil" PR, and later by Apple's creating products that “enrich people's lives.” I dont think it is this letter in particular. So may be it is not fair to criticise it. But my guess is that the accumulation of these cooperate speaks, PR, and the past 10 years of main stream media riding along these PR to new height, just happen to tricker OP this time around. And it doesn't seems to be an American things either, I read a lot of Fortune 500 post, somehow these over the top PR speak are mostly related to tech only. However, I still think Github and Nat deserve a lot of praise for what they have done. Lots of changes and improvement happened after the acquisition. And not only credit to Nat but also to Microsoft.

jaywalk 5y ago
This stuff easily predates Google's founding, and isn't remotely limited to tech. It's been standard "big corporation" stuff for a very long time.

devmunchies 5y ago

> Of course words are going to be delicately chosen? that question mark at the end of a non-question. Nothing personal, just critique on a larger trend, but IMO upspeak and vocal fry are more annoying than corporate speak. But I agree about these exit letter being more delicate. The more intimate notes are fine internally.