5 ms·
Here is basically the core of the communications. https://imgur.com/a/y1dMhd2 https://imgur.com/a/y1dMhd2
by kjaftaedi 5y ago
Here is basically the core of the communications.
https://imgur.com/a/y1dMhd2 https://imgur.com/a/y1dMhd2
- fooker 5y agoWow this is very unprofessional. I'd think twice before hosting anything with them.
- mixmastamyk 5y agoYeah, that guy definitely should be fired for addressing a customer that way. Assuming this is all accurate.
- mfru 5y agoIf accurate this is a disgusting way of communication on behalf of the Hetzner employee. I would immediately consider to move my projects to another provider if I were a customer with them. They have an account on HN, so maybe they could clarify. I certainly wouldn't be considering to become a client with them.
- Hetzner_OL 5y agoHi again, I see. Before I respond, could I ask you to please re-post that image without my colleague's name in it? And could you also edit your above comment so that my colleague's name is no longer in it. Unfortunately, some of our coworkers have been harassed in the past after their names were published online. So we try to prevent this from happening. Thanks in advance for doing that. I really appreciate it. Okay my response - Again, I think there is a bit of a cultural misunderstanding going on here. I would say most Germans understand that they are responsible for verifying their identity and using their legal name when making important purchases or doing something else official. Here, names that do not match are often a sign that the account is fake. We find hundreds of fake accounts every week. Fake accounts are very closely linked with criminal behavior, people who otherwise abuse our products, and people who do not follow our ToS. Clearly, we do not want to attract customers with fake accounts to our company. So if we find an account that seems fake, it does not make sense for us to expend extra time and energy to write to that customer and ask them if they made a mistake when they entered their name on their customer account. That would dramatically increase the likelihood that spammers and scammers would get accounts and abuse our services. It would not only hurt our customers (because it would hurt our the trustworthiness of our IPs, etc.), but it would also lead to a massive increase in abuse and to victims affected by that abuse. So, I agree that the tone from my colleague could be better here. And I will talk to him about that. And, again, for that, we are sorry. But the basic content of what he wrote is sound in my opinion. --Katie
- kjaftaedi 5y agoHi. I have resent the image with better redactions and offer my apologies. As I mentioned in other comments, my issue is not whose mistake this was, as I'm sure we can both agree that technically I am to blame for my mistake. My issue is that there was no attempt to amicably resolve this. The end result was that I lost 15 days worth of labor where I was spending 10-16 hours per day trying to launch a product. I was unable to recover from the loss of momentum that was incurred by this. (I mean, who really can maintain that type of work effort for an extended period?) The end result was that the project eventually failed and I lost an amount of revenue that was significant to me. Again, I am not trying to express that I am not to blame for not closer checking forms that my browser autofills for legal accuracy .. moreso I am suggesting that this could have been resolved by just sending an e-mail to double check things with me before deleting all of my data. I also reject your idea of deleting accounts that "seem fake". If you have a valid e-mail address, and a valid credit card, which all share more or less the same name, are you really going to reach for the delete button? This is exactly my issue, and is what cost me so much grief. If someone gets married and changes their name, are you going to delete their data too? This is a rhetorical question. At any rate, I can only hope your company adopts a less hostile stance towards your customers, but I do appreciate you taking the time to respond.
- Hetzner_OL 5y agoFirst, thanks for editing your other posts. I really and sincerely appreciate it. :) Second, I am very sorry that you lost so much work. I remember long ago losing around two weeks' worth of work on my master's thesis, so I understand the grief that's involved. I got much better at making multiple backups after that. But it really sucked, and when I think about it today, it still makes me a bit sad. I can understand how you still feel burned by that experience with us. I do appreciate you talking to me about what happened. Really. The marriage-name-change question is a good one, actually. If someone legally changes their name after they are already a customer with us, they can write us a support request and make sure this gets changed in their customer information. If a customer who's just changed their name legally wants to be sure they get an account, they should update their legal ID first. (But I think most people in this situation do quickly update their legal IDs. I know my husband did when he took my name.) We do have a brand new Head of Customer Service, and I will be sharing feedback from customers about their negative experiences. And I am sure that he will talk that into consideration when he assesses our processes and how we can improve them. --Katie
- dang 5y agoEdit: this is fixed now—see the comments below. --- You blurred out your own name but left the other person's name in cleartext. That's not playing fair. I've killed this comment. If you want to make another image that blurs out both names, let me know at hn@ycombinator.com and I'll be happy to unkill the comment. You can make your substantive point about your interaction with the company without spotlighting an individual like that.
- kjaftaedi 5y agoYou are absolutely correct. Just a note that I appreciate all of the hard work you do here to keep the conversation here civil, and will strive better to follow the example you set for all of us. The redactions have been redone and forwarded.
- dang 5y agoOk, I've replaced the link above, and restored your post. Thanks for doing that!