4 ms·

"This often involves the settlers dispossessing indigenous inhabitants, or instituting legal and other structures which systematically disadvantage them" The C

"This often involves the settlers dispossessing indigenous inhabitants, or instituting legal and other structures which systematically disadvantage them" The Cholas did not do any of these. They only wanted to stop piracy and extortion which was making trade more risky. This was overall helpful to the economy of the whole region. The Mughals imposed Jizya, imposed language, paid tributes to Afganistan. This was done as late as with Aurangazeb. The Mopalla Hindu massacre was a continuation of Tipu's demographic change, forced conversion and raids on Hindus of the coorg in particular which went on for a period of more than 100 years by then.

teleforce 5y ago
Yes sure, they want to stop piracy and extortion to guarantee their trade activities. Exactly the same classic reasons given by the Dutch and British East India company to their respective government to intervene and colonize any strategic foreign land! It seems you have cherry picked the definition that best suited your own skewed agenda. Please check the main definition from the dictionary (and also other parts of the Wikipedia), "a person who helps take control of an area or a country that is not their own, especially using force, and sends people from their own country to live there". Please check your history, Chola dynasty did sent their own people to these conquered foreign places and some of Chola descendents continued to rule several parts of South East Asian countries. Mysore and Mughal dynasty are both from India subcontinent and according to some reputable historians that includes Afghanistan. Yes their ancestors are perhaps from somewhere else similar to Chola ruling class or upper caste who ancestors most probably from Aryan descendents originated from northern regions [1]. It just like saying now that cosmopolitan American including Irish, Chinese, Jewish, Scandinavian are all the US colonizer because their ancestors are from somewhere else eventhough they have lived there several generations for hundreds of years. Genuinely asking you for a third time any reliable source of references regarding massacre done by Tipu Sultan, if not it's just hearsay and evil slander to systematically tarnish this Indian hero of independence, and shame on you. [1]Tiruvalangadu Inscription States That Cholas Are Descendants of Aryan King Bharata: https://www.indictales.com/2019/02/20/tiruvalangadu-inscription-states-that-cholas-are-descendants-of-aryan-king-bharata https://www.indictales.com/2019/02/20/tiruvalangadu-inscript...
- naruvimama 5y ago
  "India that is Bharat" is prominent in our constitution. The name Bharat comes from the name Bharata. I do not see a reason why I need to justify why Cholas who are very much Indian with Indian roots being my hero. Whereas Mughals are foreign invaders with a fundamentalist Islamist agenda with no roots to the country or allegiance to the people are villains. If you feel that other way, perhaps that is why Pakistan was created. Pakistan 99% muslim Bangladesh 25%-30% muslim (1951) -> 8% muslim (2011) Kashmir 77% muslim (1991) -> 99% muslim (in a span of 1 month) Al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS ......... the list goes on and on, this is not something from the past it is a continuing problem. This has existed since the 7th century, and seems to only get worse. You might be from a religion of the book and perhaps that is why you are living by definitions from a dictionary, I am not. The vast majority of the Tamil people who are today citizens of Malaysia went as bonded labourers during the British era. Why do you hate the Cholas did they destroy your culture or people or make your ancestors into refugees. I clearly hate the Mughals because they are destructive foreign invaders blinded by theological hate for non-believers especially idol worshipers, and this is a continuing problem within the country even after the partition.
- naruvimama 5y ago
  https://youtu.be/5dn5vxpbEFk https://youtu.be/5dn5vxpbEFk

teleforce 5y ago

Yes sure, they want to stop piracy and extortion to guarantee their trade activities. Exactly the same classic reasons given by the Dutch and British East India company to their respective government to intervene and colonize any strategic foreign land! It seems you have cherry picked the definition that best suited your own skewed agenda. Please check the main definition from the dictionary (and also other parts of the Wikipedia), "a person who helps take control of an area or a country that is not their own, especially using force, and sends people from their own country to live there". Please check your history, Chola dynasty did sent their own people to these conquered foreign places and some of Chola descendents continued to rule several parts of South East Asian countries. Mysore and Mughal dynasty are both from India subcontinent and according to some reputable historians that includes Afghanistan. Yes their ancestors are perhaps from somewhere else similar to Chola ruling class or upper caste who ancestors most probably from Aryan descendents originated from northern regions [1]. It just like saying now that cosmopolitan American including Irish, Chinese, Jewish, Scandinavian are all the US colonizer because their ancestors are from somewhere else eventhough they have lived there several generations for hundreds of years. Genuinely asking you for a third time any reliable source of references regarding massacre done by Tipu Sultan, if not it's just hearsay and evil slander to systematically tarnish this Indian hero of independence, and shame on you. [1]Tiruvalangadu Inscription States That Cholas Are Descendants of Aryan King Bharata: https://www.indictales.com/2019/02/20/tiruvalangadu-inscription-states-that-cholas-are-descendants-of-aryan-king-bharata https://www.indictales.com/2019/02/20/tiruvalangadu-inscript...

naruvimama 5y ago
"India that is Bharat" is prominent in our constitution. The name Bharat comes from the name Bharata. I do not see a reason why I need to justify why Cholas who are very much Indian with Indian roots being my hero. Whereas Mughals are foreign invaders with a fundamentalist Islamist agenda with no roots to the country or allegiance to the people are villains. If you feel that other way, perhaps that is why Pakistan was created. Pakistan 99% muslim Bangladesh 25%-30% muslim (1951) -> 8% muslim (2011) Kashmir 77% muslim (1991) -> 99% muslim (in a span of 1 month) Al-Qaeda, Taliban, ISIS ......... the list goes on and on, this is not something from the past it is a continuing problem. This has existed since the 7th century, and seems to only get worse. You might be from a religion of the book and perhaps that is why you are living by definitions from a dictionary, I am not. The vast majority of the Tamil people who are today citizens of Malaysia went as bonded labourers during the British era. Why do you hate the Cholas did they destroy your culture or people or make your ancestors into refugees. I clearly hate the Mughals because they are destructive foreign invaders blinded by theological hate for non-believers especially idol worshipers, and this is a continuing problem within the country even after the partition.
naruvimama 5y ago
https://youtu.be/5dn5vxpbEFk https://youtu.be/5dn5vxpbEFk