5 ms·
If you use Florida as a basis for risk, it's almost non existent last few weeks. Unless you're old, a fat, or have a preexisting risk is relatively low.
by frockington1 5y ago
If you use Florida as a basis for risk, it's almost non existent last few weeks. Unless you're old, a fat, or have a preexisting risk is relatively low.
- SketchySeaBeast 5y ago> a fat I sincerely hope that is a typo/second language error and not how you're describing/thinking about people.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- theonemind 5y ago> Unless you're old, a fat, or have a preexisting risk is relatively low. Unless you're [most people in the United States] Those probably cover like 60% of the US population (mostly due to prevalent obesity and an aging population)
- datameta 5y agoPeople would be surprised how many people they know have an invisible condition that they get through life with relatively ok, but that is absolutely a risk due to covid.
- browningstreet 5y agoSo we're all subject to broad measures because people lack self-awareness and a reality based worldview? It's one of the aspects of the current lockdown measures that I'm growing weary of. There's no specificity w/r/t who are actually the most vulnerable.
- datameta 5y agoActually it is quite well defined by now which medical conditions are comorbidities, and we've known the increase in risk as we go up in age group. Where do you currently see conflicting evidence? It's quite convenient to think only of oneself when one is at low risk. If we can't successfully appeal to community and altruism, then simply imagine what it would be like to be diagnosed with a condition that no longer gives you the luxury of holding personal freedom above all else.