4 ms·
We're also using Tandem (http://tandem.chat http://tandem.chat), which looks fantastic in comparison. Not sure exactly why. Resolution is still 480k, but the fr
by tjansen 5y ago
We're also using Tandem (http://tandem.chat http://tandem.chat), which looks fantastic in comparison. Not sure exactly why. Resolution is still 480k, but the frame rate is noticeably higher, and possibly the compression rate as well.
- GekkePrutser 5y agoI'm indeed surprised how much of a difference frame rate makes. I use Jitsi a lot privately and it seems to prioritise frame rate over frame quality. At work we use ms teams which seems to do the opposite. The Teams footage looks crisper but every time I'm on Jitsi I have this "wow this looks real" feeling. Of course lighting is also really important as many cheap cams have sensors too small to do 30fps in low light. Let alone 60 which I think no current video conferencing product does.