3 ms·
Hi The source for that is a number of studies I have read, and that is why I am using such a huge range. For example, the numbers in [1] are quite bleak from
by OrvalWintermute 5y ago
Hi
The source for that is a number of studies I have read, and that is why I am using such a huge range. For example, the numbers in [1] are quite bleak from a % basis, more so than other studies.
On the other hand, myo/pericarditis are known side effects of vaccination in general. In general I don't think that dissuades us, because the rates are usually low. Not in this case though.
Fortunately, I believe some researchers have already identified a partial cause, that being intravenous injection of the vaccines rather than intramuscular [2], and related [3]
[1] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34341797/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34341797/
[2] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34406358/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34406358/
[3] https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34453510/ https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34453510/
- mewpmewp2 5y agoIf aspiration is such an obvious solution why isn't this information immediately broadcasted to all the doctors and nurses, as many of these are still mind boggled when you ask for aspiration?