3 ms·
You're right about that being wrong, and the author makes the same mistake consistently, but otherwise it looks correct. Some steps have details elided where it
by tgb 5y ago
You're right about that being wrong, and the author makes the same mistake consistently, but otherwise it looks correct. Some steps have details elided where it maybe should have been noted that things were being skipped, but with correct results. I think it's wonderfully written and a great exposition.
- codeflo 5y agoThanks, that helps. When I notice errors in the stuff I already know about, it find it hard to trust the other information that’s new to me.
- mferraro89 5y agohey, if you have time to detail those mistakes I'd be happy to fix them in the text. Can you email me at mattferraro.dev@gmail.com