3 ms·
I remember when I went from Win32 with Petzold to Qt and was flabbergasted: "GUIs can be this easy?!"
by formerly_proven 5y ago
I remember when I went from Win32 with Petzold to Qt and was flabbergasted: "GUIs can be this easy?!"
- pjmlp 5y agoYou could have seen that already with Object Windows Library or Visual Components Library from Borland. Even MFC, although lower level than Borland offerings, is much better than plain Win32. Using bare bones Win32 is only for masochists that sweare for C's "simplicity". Although Windows team seems to have enough of them, so nowadays legacy MFC or Qt/VCL are a much better experience than XAML C++, given the lack of Visual Studio tooling for it.
- formerly_proven 5y agoI wasn't using C when I got the Petzold, so only stuff reachable from C FFI was usable.
- jstimpfle 5y ago> Using bare bones Win32 is only for masochists that sweare for C's "simplicity". Pulling another straw man, are we?