20 ms·
The most likely answer is that politicians who maintain the prohibition profit from it directly or indirectly. There is no other answer to that. Unfortunately
by varispeed 5y ago
The most likely answer is that politicians who maintain the prohibition profit from it directly or indirectly. There is no other answer to that.
Unfortunately drug prohibition is also in the law enforcement interest so they won't investigate politicians' links to drug trade.
- f7f8rurjfi 5y agoSince HN apparently hates actual dialogue about racial issues (what a shock from a primarily white userbase) I'll reply to bellyfullofbac here: I wasn't aware I had to explain that there is a history of racist oppression in many countries that has left minority groups, particularly people of African decent, at a disproportionate handicap when it comes to both inherited wealth and social mobility. Similarly, regressive taxation is so simple I'll save you the trouble of figuring out the keyword and sinply say that I chose "regressive" for a reason. I'm glad I could give you the opportunity to be glib since you seem to be orgasming from the opportunity to be racist without consequence however. I wouldn't want to make you feel guilty when I point out that minority groups typically suffer from classicism the most due to the aforementioned history.