4 ms·

CDE? That's an acronym I haven't heard in a long time. Still being developed? Very nice. Brings back happy memories of running oddball screen resolutions on X

CDE? That's an acronym I haven't heard in a long time. Still being developed? Very nice. Brings back happy memories of running oddball screen resolutions on X Window. 1000x800 I think. Definitely not 1024. Monitor couldn't do 1024. But it could do 1000. The 800 number is hazy but in the ball park. One thing I did notice was the fonts. Those pixels. Time to fire up CDE for some nostalgia.

lproven 5y ago
I used to use 1152×864. It worked well on 17" CRTs, and now I look it up, it just fit into 1MB of VRAM in a 256-colour mode. Also see Sun's 1152×900 and Apple's 1152×870 (albeit that was on a much bigger screen). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution#1152_%C3%97_864_(XGA+) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution#11... Classic MacOS screen modes always tried to deliver square pixels, in contrast to IBM/PC-compatible screen modes where pixels were rectangular. Apple also tried to stick to a consistent 72dpi for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch#Computer_monitor_DPI_standards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch#Computer_monitor...
- sfgweilr4f 5y ago
  The monitor I had wasn't capable of 1024x768. I got that custom resolution using a manually defined modeline determined through experimentation. It wasn't a simple VESA style display setting like the later 15" monitor I got. A flat CRT was quite a sight.
  - lproven 5y ago
    OK, fair enough. I don't think that's one I saw, then. I do recall netbooks with 1024×600 screens, which were a bit of a pain. E.g. in Ubuntu Netbook Edition, LibreOffice dialog boxes wouldn't fit on the screen -- they extended off the bottom. Meaning you couldn't reach the "OK" or "Cancel" buttons. >_< Another fun exercise was configuring an old Dell PowerEdge server I had, connected to a very old mono VGA monitor. *Really* VGA: it maxed out at 640×480 -- but sitting on top of the server, it fit under my table and it didn't draw much power. Every allegedly text-only server Linux distro I tried -- I remember Ubuntu Server & Debian, but probably more -- had an 800×600 graphical splash screen, which sent my monitor into conniptions so that I then couldn't complete the setup process. This was a problem with Windows Server 2008, too. It assumed you had unaccelerated SVGA graphics and couldn't and wouldn't do actual VGA mode. I had to identify my motherboard GPU, find a Vista driver for it, install it, accept a compatibility warning, and then I could forcibly choose the monitor type and pick IBM PS/2 VGA. Then Windows believed me and displayed a 640×480 mode that my screen could show.

lproven 5y ago

I used to use 1152×864. It worked well on 17" CRTs, and now I look it up, it just fit into 1MB of VRAM in a 256-colour mode. Also see Sun's 1152×900 and Apple's 1152×870 (albeit that was on a much bigger screen). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution#1152_%C3%97_864_(XGA+) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphics_display_resolution#11... Classic MacOS screen modes always tried to deliver square pixels, in contrast to IBM/PC-compatible screen modes where pixels were rectangular. Apple also tried to stick to a consistent 72dpi for a long time. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch#Computer_monitor_DPI_standards https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dots_per_inch#Computer_monitor...

sfgweilr4f 5y ago
The monitor I had wasn't capable of 1024x768. I got that custom resolution using a manually defined modeline determined through experimentation. It wasn't a simple VESA style display setting like the later 15" monitor I got. A flat CRT was quite a sight.
- lproven 5y ago
  OK, fair enough. I don't think that's one I saw, then. I do recall netbooks with 1024×600 screens, which were a bit of a pain. E.g. in Ubuntu Netbook Edition, LibreOffice dialog boxes wouldn't fit on the screen -- they extended off the bottom. Meaning you couldn't reach the "OK" or "Cancel" buttons. >_< Another fun exercise was configuring an old Dell PowerEdge server I had, connected to a very old mono VGA monitor. *Really* VGA: it maxed out at 640×480 -- but sitting on top of the server, it fit under my table and it didn't draw much power. Every allegedly text-only server Linux distro I tried -- I remember Ubuntu Server & Debian, but probably more -- had an 800×600 graphical splash screen, which sent my monitor into conniptions so that I then couldn't complete the setup process. This was a problem with Windows Server 2008, too. It assumed you had unaccelerated SVGA graphics and couldn't and wouldn't do actual VGA mode. I had to identify my motherboard GPU, find a Vista driver for it, install it, accept a compatibility warning, and then I could forcibly choose the monitor type and pick IBM PS/2 VGA. Then Windows believed me and displayed a 640×480 mode that my screen could show.