Its all about the liability they are willing to assume. Dont confuse that with the law itself. Its the same about wondering why one person gets culturally “can

Its all about the liability they are willing to assume. Dont confuse that with the law itself. Its the same about wondering why one person gets culturally “cancelled” and another doesn't for the same action: The people beside them have a large enough rainy day fund and don't mind the risk. It says nothing about what the culture actually believes either way, only the risk tolerance of the wealthy backers. Huh, reminds me of the princeton study that said the same thing about progressive laws that get passed, where the culture has no effect on anything except that sometimes it coincidentally matches what wealthy special interests were already doing, with the caveat that its more of a direct democracy for the wealthy special interests but an additional level of representative democracy for everyone else.