> That doesn't mean that these restrictions should be dependent on entirely subjective things like thoughts and feelings. That doesn't necessarily mean that re

> That doesn't mean that these restrictions should be dependent on entirely subjective things like thoughts and feelings. That doesn't necessarily mean that restrictions should be dependent on entirely subjective things. Subjectivity alone is not sufficient cause to refuse considering whether the benefits of a proposed legal restriction on behavior outweigh the drawbacks. Subjectivity is a drawback, not a deal-breaker, and must be evaluated in full context alongside the benefits of the proposal. Subjectivity is a serious concern, and should never be glossed over or minimized in such evaluations. Subjectivity carries great risk, and should be revisited and reevaluated over time to ensure that the outcomes are considered against the intentions.