3 ms·
What to Do If Your Blog Goes Viral: 10 Tips
- glimcat 15y ago> Consider watermarking all of your photos This part isn't such an awesome idea.
- sixtofour 15y agoWhy not, specifically? I can imagine technical and aesthetic reasons. What are your objections?
- glimcat 15y agoIt's self-defeating because it degrades the quality of your site, it's self-defeating because it blocks some user behaviors for discussing your site, and it doesn't work. Rule of thumb: if you don't want something shared, don't put it on the internet. There are a few reasonable exceptions. Stock photo sites should probably use watermarks and reduced-size images. Unobtrusively signing images sometimes also makes sense (not watermarking) as it can serve branding interests. But trying to block browser interactions is just annoying. Don't do that, it's a great big sin against usability that violates the rule of least surprise. If it's over-done, it may keep me from easily opening links in a new tab. It also makes it hard to open images in a new tab if I'm trying to get a better look at them on a limited display.
- sixtofour 15y agoThanks.
- wgx 15y agoWhile I sympathise with OP's frustration at others making money from their work - there is provision in UK copyright law: "using any work, for the purpose of reporting current events, with sufficient acknowledgement, is a valid exception to copyright". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing_in_United_Kingdom_law#Reporting_of_current_events http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_dealing_in_United_Kingdom_...