> Also, cowards. I don't like this system where activists Are you sure it isn't just that not enough people opted in for it to be worth the cost of maintaining

> Also, cowards. I don't like this system where activists Are you sure it isn't just that not enough people opted in for it to be worth the cost of maintaining that part of the service? > FB has a responsibility to its shareholders to maximize profit within the law Which it may be doing here, by removing infrastructure and people from running and maintaining a feature, resources that can then be used on features that have a better effect on the bottom line. Or are you believing that it is entirely about “finding balance” morally (or at least in the court of public opinion), rather than balancing the bottom line financially (even if just in part)?