2 ms·
This is quite weird and unfortunate. Also, does the world need yet another DAW? There are dozens of DAWs, some free, some not. Most of them are excellent; all
by bambax 5y ago
This is quite weird and unfortunate.
Also, does the world need yet another DAW? There are dozens of DAWs, some free, some not. Most of them are excellent; all of them let you use non-4/4 time signatures.
- mcguire 5y agoAudacity replacement?
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoAudacity (as it currently stands) is an audio file editor, not a DAW. Under its new management, it seems likely that it will evolve into something with many DAW features within a year or two.
- xook 5y agoGenuine question: How many are written in Rust? Maybe it's more "See, Rust can, too!" type software? Footnote: I have not done extensive research, hence the question.
- bambax 5y agoI don't know. Probably none. But I'm quite confident no musician or other user of a DAW cares what language it's written in. If the goal is to demonstrate that Rust can be used to write that kind of software, then hey why not; but they will need to have users at some point, to be able to actually call it a DAW.
- devilduck 5y agoI think we don't need another DAW unless it is a very different approach from the current options.